Legal Opinion

People v. Badia-Almonte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from her convictions for criminal sale and possession of a controlled substance, defendant’s primary contention is that the court erred in trying her in absentia. She argues that she cannot be deemed to have waived her right to be present at trial because, although she repeatedly and clearly was apprised that trial would proceed if she failed to appear (see, People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 140-141), she was not informed that trial would commence on a specific date (see, People v Rivers, 163 AD2d 812, 813). Where, as here, the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. TejadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. ColonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. DelvalleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. RiversAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Andre C. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API