Legal Opinion

ESCA Corp. v. KPMG Peat Marwick

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 9, 1997No. 37012-0-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

We hold that the principle of comparative fault applies to a cause of action for negligent misrepresentation. In so doing, we affirm a verdict awarding Seattle First National Bank (Seafirst) damages from KPMG Peat Marwick (KPMG) for negligence in the preparation of an audit, reduced by 60 percent, the percentage of fault attributed to Seafirst for its own negligence. Additionally, we reject KPMG’s challenge to the verdict on the basis of the jury’s inconsistent answers to questions posed in the instructions. The possibility of the inconsistency was inherent in the instructions, instructions…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Mason v. Mortgage America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. ESCA Corp. v. KPMG Peat MarwickWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. ESCA Corp. v. KPMG Peat MarwickWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Thola v. HenschellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Thola v. HenschellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Spradlin Rock Products, Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API