Legal Opinion
Mariasch v. Gillette Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 27, 2008No. 07-1549PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
In this diversity case, Mario O. Mariasch, a citizen of California, claims that The Gillette Company, his former employer and a Delaware Corporation, wrongfully rejected his attempt to exercise stock options that he acquired in 1995 and 1996 as part of his executive compensation package. After Mariasch retired from Gillette on April 22, 2002, he had three years to exercise these options pursuant to Gillette’s 1971 Stock Option Plan (“Stock Option Plan”). Mariasch tried to exercise the options seven days after the three-year period lapsed and was rebuffed by Gillette. He…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Harrison v. NetCentric Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Beard v. ElsterSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- Ingram v. Brinks IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- NPS LLC v. Ambac Assurance Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Merrill Lynch v. Flanders-BordenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Fine v. Sovereign BankDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Natale v. Espy Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Cruickshank v. Dixon (In re Blast Fitness Grp., LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.