Legal Opinion

A. H. Andrews Co. v. Colonial Theatre Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 23, 1922No. 249PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

This is a motion by the plaintiff to set aside the verdict directed by the court in favor of the defendant and to grant a new trial. The action was brought by an Illinois corporation, which was not authorized to do business in Michigan, against a Michigan corporation, which occupied and was preparing to equip a new theater building, for the recovery of damages under a contract between the parties for the sale and installation in said theater, by plaintiff, of certain theater chairs. The contract provided in substance that “the party of the first part [plaintiff] agrees…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. General Railway Signal Co. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Diamond Glue Co. v. United States Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Power Specialty Co. v. Michigan Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smilansky v. Mandel Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Interstate Const. Co. v. Lakeview Canal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  3. National Sign Co. v. MacCar Cleveland Sales Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Knapp v. StraussMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. General Highways System v. DennisMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API