Legal Opinion

569 East County etc. v. Backcountry etc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 2016No. D068538MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 12/29/16 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION OPINION ON REHEARING COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 569 EAST COUNTY BOULEVARD LLC et D068538 al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2014-00025797- v. CU-MC-CTL) BACKCOUNTRY AGAINST THE DUMP, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION INC., AND DENYING REHEARING (NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT) Defendant and Appellant. THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on December 5, 2015, be modified as follows: 1. On page 3, at the end of footnote 3, after the last line of the paragraph…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API