Legal Opinion

Holt v. Winfield Bank

United States Circuit Court

Decided December 16, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

These two eases are tried together. The first case presents this question: The Winfield Bank, by its president, subscribed a thousand dollars towards the building of a creamery in Win-field. I think it immaterial to state the form in which the plan was to he carried out. The sum and substance of if was that the bank, by its president, subscribed a thousand dollars towards the building of a creamery; an.d the question is whether the bank is bound by tiiat subscription.

Counsel for plaintiff have with great diligence found and submitted to me some 25 or 30 cases involving the question of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Abeles v. CochranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crowder State Bank v. Aetna Powder Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. McCarty v. LoveMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Merchants & Planters Packet Co. v. StreubyMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Geraghty v. Washtenaw Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API