Legal Opinion
People v. Espino-Paez
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 25, 2014No. Court of Appeals No. 12CA2635PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by JUDGE ROTHENBERG*
¶ 1 Defendant, Jose Sabino Espino-Paez, appeals the district court's denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Crim. P. 35(c) and Crim. P. 32(d). We affirm the order denying relief under Crim. P. 35(c), and we dismiss that portion of the appeal challenging the order denying relief under Crim. P. 32(d).
I. Background
¶ 2 In August 1996, defendant pleaded guilty to the use of a schedule II controlled substance and received a deferred judgment for one year on the condition that he successfully complete drug and alcohol treatment. When he successfully…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pinho v. Atty Gen USACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Kazadi v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- People v. CarbajalSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Town of Pagosa Springs v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- People v. CarbajalColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. Corrales-CastroColorado Court of Appeals · 2015