Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Tate

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1991No. 62312PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

On August 21,1991, petitioner Ronald Smith commenced this habeas corpus action against Arthur Tate, Jr., Warden of the Lucasville Correctional Facility, “to execute a warrant of conveyance removing [Ronald Smith] from the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, forthwith.” In the alternative, Smith pled mandamus seeking the same relief. The gravamen of his complaint is that he is being improperly held in Lucasville, because this court of appeals has vacated his guilty plea and remanded his case to the trial court for further proceedings. Thus, the warden either has no power to continue to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ney v. NiehausOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Olander v. Ohio Environmental Protection AgencyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. Rand, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1969
  4. State ex rel. Fairfield County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Fairfield County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sprinkman & Sons Corp. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API