State ex rel. Childs v. Routh
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
On the first Monday of April, 1893, William G. Goffe, a practicing physician, was duly appointed health officer of the city of Duluth. He accepted the office, and continued to discharge the duties thereof until March 10, 1895, when the respondent, Walter W. Routh, who was also a practicing physician, was, as he claims, duly appointed such health officer*by a majority vote of all of the members of the common council of such city, by virtue of the provisions of Sp. Laws 1887, c. 2, as amended by Sp. Laws 1891, c. 55, and the health ordinance of the city, approved February 25, 1895. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Lum v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- St. Paul Division No. 1, Sons of Temperance v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State ex rel. Donovan v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- City of Reno v. StoddardNevada Supreme Court · 1917
- Clapp v. Minnesota Grass Twine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Town of Alden v. EastonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901