Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Seaman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 15, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application by executors for instructions.

1Opinion of the Court

O’Brien, S.

This is an application under section 228 of the Surrogate’s Court Act for an order of the surrogate giving directions as to the custody of property belonging to the estate. The petitioners, John W. Hill and Beatrice K. Brown, are two of the three executors. The respondent, Harry A. Cochrane, is the third executor. The property involved consists of a diamond ring, *532pearl necklace, diamond earrings and two brooches. The respondent claims that the testatrix gave him the pearl necklace and diamond earrings during her lifetime, and that, therefore, they are his property. He denies…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of Van AlstyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. In Re the Estate of HousmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. In re the Estate of WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. In re Estate of HumphreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. In re the Estate of AppelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of MatheronNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API