Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Appel

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 15, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application for an order of discovery.

1Opinion of the Court

Cohalan, S.

This is an application for an order in a discovery proceeding. It plainly appears from the petition that the petitioner is not entitled to the order, because a discovery proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court cannot be used for the purpose of collecting a debt. Where it appears on the face of the petition that delivery cannot be directed, an order to attend an inquiry should not be granted. This precise question was presented and decided in Estate of Denham, N. Y. L. J., June 23,1917, where this court said:

“ The petitioners in the discovery proceeding admit in the brief filed in their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. In re DenhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Application for Examination Pursuant to Section 205 in the Estate of BawerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
  2. In re the Estate of StiassniNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  3. In re the Estate of GlasgowNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923
  4. In re the Estate of SeamanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923
  5. In re the Estate of TheirichNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API