Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Tire & Supply v. Bass

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 21, 1966No. 5-3818PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

The appellants (defendants) prosecute this appeal from an order of the Circuit Court granting the appellees (plaintiffs) a new-trial (Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2101 [Repl. 1962] as amended by Act No. 547 of 1963).

Appellee Bass and appellee Taylor filed separate actions against the appellants, Oklahoma Tire & Supply Company and Doyle Watts, its employee. Each plaintiff claimed damages resulting from a traffic mishap alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of Watts. Testimony offered by the plaintiffs was to the following-effect : Bass, in his Cadillac, and Taylor,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houston v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. PtakSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. Equitable Discount Corp. v. TrotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Rhoden v. LoveladySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  5. Burton v. BinghamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Randle v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Schaub v. LinehanIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hunter v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Fry v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Burdette v. MadisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API