Legal Opinion

Houston v. Adams

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 31, 1965No. 5-3536PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Eose Smith, J.

This is an action by the appellees, husband and wife, for personal injuries, loss of consortium, and property damage resulting from a traffic collision at a street intersection in North Little Eock. The defendants, the owner and the driver of the truck that struck the Adams car, filed an answer denying negligence on their part and pleading what was in substance a second denial of negligence; that is, that the collision was the result of an unavoidable accident. The jury verdict was for the defendants. On the plaintiffs’ motion the trial judge set the verdict aside and ordered a new trial.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lewis v. Buckskin Joe's, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Fenton v. AleshireOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Vespe v. DiMarcoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Reinhart v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Evans v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Rogers v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Evans v. Allwhite, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  5. Oklahoma Tire & Supply v. BassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API