Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Mee

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided November 29, 1921No. 111PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Separate suits by Joe Middleton, by Erank M. Lawler; by Henry Schoberl, by Lee Schoberl, by Andrew Anderson, by Emil Mutschelknaus, by Charles Rosenbaum, Sr., by Charles Rosenbaum, Jr., by Henry Goehring, and by Matt Evans against J. W. Mee, Col-' lector of Internal Revenue. On motion for preliminary injunction and motion by defendant to dismiss.

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIOTT, District Judge.

Separate suits in equity having been brought by Joe Middleton, Erank M. Lawler, Henry Schoberl, Lee Schoberl, Andrew Anderson, Emil Mutschelknaus, Charles Rosenbaum, Sr., Charles Rosenbaum, Jr., Henry Goehring, and Matt Evans, against *493J. W. Mee, collector of internal revenue for the district of South Dakota, upon motion of the plaintiff an order to show cause was entered in each case, and the motion of the respective plaintiffs for preliminary injunctions against the defendant, as collector of internal revenue, restraining him, pending the suits, from seizing and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  2. Thome v. LynchDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Regents of University System of Georgia v. PageCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  2. Jasper v. HellmichDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1925
  3. Regents of University System of Georgia v. PageCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API