Jasper v. Hellmich
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
FARIS, District Judge.
This is a suit for a permanent injunction to prevent defendants from collecting by distraint certain so-called taxes and tax penalties from plaintiff under the provisions of section 35 of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138½v).
Pursuant to certain regulations of the Treasury Department, made and promulgated for the making of collections of taxes and penalties under said section 35, supra, notice was given by defendants to plaintiff that there had been assessed against him taxes and penalties under said section 35 in the total sum of $1,866.66,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Wong Wing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. IshamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- O'Sullivan v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- William Arvidson v. Dillingham Corporation, a Corporation Doing Business Under the Assumed Business Name of Albina Engine & MacHine WorksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. One Chevrolet CoupéDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1925
- Danciger v. CrooksDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1926
- United States Industrial Alcohol Co. v. BlairDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1925
- Frost v. Child and Family Services of San Bernardino CountyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021