Legal Opinion

Manzano Oil Corp. v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc.

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided August 27, 2001No. 00-178-WWD/KBMPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DEATON, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed July 27, 2001 (Doc. 28). Plaintiffs oppose the motion. Defendant (“Chesapeake”), seeks a declaratory judgment on an oil and gas lease finding that Defendant took action necessary under the lease to extend the primary term beyond its expiration date. For reasons discussed below I find that Defendant did take such action as was necessary to extend the term of the lease.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs and Defendant filed Agreed Stipulations with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Rummel v. Lexington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Maria Moya, as Personal Representative, for the Estate of Andelicio Moya v. United States of America, Department of Veteran's AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Stamm v. BuchananNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Acquisto v. Joe R. Hahn Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Hess Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Neuhard v. Range Resources-Appalachia, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API