Legal Opinion

Owen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1910No. 16,038PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Howard Kennedy, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

According to the petition, S. Cox, defendant, entered into a contract with the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railway Company, defendant, to do some grading' and excavating on its right of way on Twenty-ninth street between A and I) streets in South Omaha, and immediately sublet a.portion of the work to plaintiff, agreeing to pay him 18 cents a cubic yard for excavating and removing earth. Plaintiff commenced the job September 1, 1906, and completed it October 3, 1906, having in the meantime excavated and removed 3,690 cubic yards of earth. Neither of the defendants paid him for his -work,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guiou v. RyckmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  2. White Lake Lumber Co. v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fulghum & Union Indemnity Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Crowell Lumber & Grain Co. v. Ryan Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Drainage District No. 1 v. BowkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Dettman v. PittengerNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API