Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Himelfarb
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Jones,
This appeal brings on for review the lower court’s refusal of the defendant fiduciary’s petition, under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 PS §672, questioning the court’s jurisdiction of the petitioner.
On July 17,1946, the Prudential Insurance Company of America filed its bill in equity in the court below (Common Pleas of Delaware County) seeking to cancel a policy of insurance on the life of Frank Himelfarb. The beneficiary named in the policy was one Israel Rosenblum, a business partner of Himelfarb, their place of business being in the City of Philadelphia.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Connaway as Receiver of the Moscow National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Feierman v. Eureka Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Barlott v. ForneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Cassidy v. KnappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Baur v. Wilkes-Barre Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gilbert v. Thomson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1956
- Provident National Bank v. Continental Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Durika v. Derry Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Keasbey EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1961