Childress v. Sullivan
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES
WEINSHIENK, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Application For Attorneys’ Fees And Expenses. The Court has read the Application and its attachments, the supplemental applications, and the responses, and now determines that oral argument would not be of material assistance in rendering a decision.
Plaintiff is seeking attorneys’ fees and expenses against the federal government pursuant to the Equal Access To Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Plaintiff previously entered into a settlement agreement regarding attorneys’ fees with the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Olson v. NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Wyandotte Savings Bank v. The National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SNEEDE BY THOMPSON v. CoyeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Childress v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990