Legal Opinion

SNEEDE BY THOMPSON v. Coye

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 3, 1994No. C89-1932 TEHPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

THELTON E. HENDERSON, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs against the Federal defendants 1 under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(b) and (d) of the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). In light of this Court’s ruling, filed concurrently herewith, denying plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Corrected Second Amended Complaint, the Court denies plaintiffs’ request for fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b). However, having carefully considered the parties’ papers, supporting documentation, and the record…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aponte v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  2. Lucas v. WhiteDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
  3. Construction Industry Training Council v. Washington State Apprenticeship & Training CouncilCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  5. Raven v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API