Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Peter Gordon Balbus, Debtor. Brown and Company Securities Corporation v. Peter Gordon Balbus

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1991No. 90-2067Published

1DissentMurnaghan, Circuit Judge

Brown & Co. has asserted that, for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 506(a), the fair market value of the debtor’s real property should be reduced, in all cases, by an amount equal to the hypothetical costs of sale of the property. The majority’s quarrel with the proposition so stated is that the reduction should take place only if the debtor intends to dispose of the property. That quarrel pits authorities favoring a general rule of the deduction in all cases against what my brothers characterize as a “growing number” of jurisdictions endorsing the disposition distinction and disallowing the deduction…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Matter of CrockettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  3. In Re KleinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  4. In Re FrostDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1985
  5. In Re CourtrightUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API