Legal Opinion
Clay v. Deering
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 4, 1992No. 88-CV-1221PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants Ozzie Clay, individually, Clay Properties, Inc. and Clay and Company, Inc. appeal from the Superior Court’s order denying a motion to vacate a default judgment granted in favor of appellee, Richard C. Deering, for appellants’ failure to attend a pretrial conference and for noncompliance with prior discovery orders. Appellants claim that they did not receive notice of the pretrial conference. The Superior Court further dismissed appellants’ counterclaim and permitted a pre-judgment attachment on one of the appellants’ assets to be released to appellee after an ex parte hearing on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'NEIL v. BerganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Braxton v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Clark v. MolerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Jones v. HuntDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Dunn v. ProfittDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nuyen v. LunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- District of Columbia v. WatkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Iannucci v. PearlsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hickey v. ScottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Johnson v. BerryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.