Legal Opinion
Iannucci v. Pearlstein
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 1, 1993No. 91-CV-1003, 92-CV-832PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
This case involves a dispute between counsel and a client over attorneys fees. Appellant, Suzanne P. Iannucci, appeals the entry of judgment on the pleadings and a default judgment on the grounds that ap-pellee, Paul D. Pearlstein, was not entitled to either a judgment on the pleadings since a valid answer had not been filed, or a default judgment since there is insufficient support in the record to justify the entry of a default judgment. Alternatively, she contends that even if a default judgment had been proper, the judge erred in failing to hold a hearing on damages.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Robert Draper v. Davis S. CoombsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Mrs. Julian Lamar Davis, Temporary Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Edward Davis, Deceased v. Parkhill-Goodloe Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Spilker v. HankinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Abell v. Laihsing WangDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Oliver v. MustafaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Murphy v. BonannoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Restaurant Equipment & Supply Depot, Inc. v. GutierrezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Watkins v. Carty's Automotive Electrical Center, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.