Zahner Manufacturing Co. v. Harnish
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.
This is a suit in replevin. The case was tried before the court without the aid of a jury resulting in a judgment in favor of plaintiff, but thereafter the court sustained defendants’ motion for a new trial, not assigning any reason therefor. Plaintiff has appealed. The court having failed to state its reason for granting a new trial, it may be assumed that it was on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence as this was one of the grounds for a new trial set forth in the motion. [Alexander v. Allison, 224 S. W. 50; King v. Mann et al., 199 S. W. 705; Bernheimer v.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Howes v. NewcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Storms v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Vollmer Clearwater Co. v. Union Warehouse & Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Lazarus v. MoranMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- Birmingham v. CarrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schabbing ex rel. Mayberry v. SeabaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Zahner Manufacturing Co. v. HarnishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
- First National Bank v. Witherspoon Livestock Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1936