Legal Opinion

Zahner Manufacturing Co. v. Harnish

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is a suit in replevin. The case was tried before the court without the aid of a jury resulting in a judgment in favor of plaintiff, but thereafter the court sustained defendants’ motion for a new trial, not assigning any reason therefor. Plaintiff has appealed. The court having failed to state its reason for granting a new trial, it may be assumed that it was on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence as this was one of the grounds for a new trial set forth in the motion. [Alexander v. Allison, 224 S. W. 50; King v. Mann et al., 199 S. W. 705; Bernheimer v.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Howes v. NewcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Storms v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Vollmer Clearwater Co. v. Union Warehouse & Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Lazarus v. MoranMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Birmingham v. CarrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schabbing ex rel. Mayberry v. SeabaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Zahner Manufacturing Co. v. HarnishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. First National Bank v. Witherspoon Livestock Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API