Legal Opinion

A. B. Dick Co. v. Simplicator Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 21, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINSLOW, District Judge.

This is an equity action to restrain the alleged infringement of patent No. 1,526,982 for a stencil sheet, granted to plaintiff February 17, 1925, on application filed April 7, 1922, by Edward W. Hill.

A stencil sheet is a sheet adapted to be converted into a stencil for multiplying copies in duplicating machines such as those sold by the plaintiff under the name “Mimeograph.”

The plaintiff manufactures machines for producing prints by stencil process, and supplies for the machines. The machines are *714sold practically at cost — its profits are mainly derived from supplies.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. B. Dick Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  2. Electrical Engineers' Equipment Co. v. Champion Switch Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  3. A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter, Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. B. Dick Co. v. MarrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  2. A. B. Dick Co. v. Arlac Dry Stencil Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Dykema v. Liggett Drug Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API