In re Day Lumber Co.

(after stating the facts as above).

The widow contends: (a) That the bankruptcy court has not jurisdiction over the question between her and the bonding company; (b) that, if the court has jurisdic*286tion, the bonding company is not entitled to be subrogated, and that its claim ranks as a general creditor of the estate of the deceased trustee.

The first question as to the court’s jurisdiction, in a somewhat similar ease, was discussed and disposed of in Re Cochran (D. C.) 40 F. (2d) 282, this day filed. The court has jurisdiction. The fund is in custodia legis, and no change or relation subsequent…