Legal Opinion

Cole v. Van Keuren

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion for a new trial on newly discovered evidence, and because of the relationship of one juror to the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtWestbrook, J.

This action, originally commenced in justice’s court to recover for injuries done to plaintiff’s clothes^ was removed into this court by a plea that the locus in quo *452was a highway. Upon the second trial of the action at the Ulster circuit in April, 1873, the plaintiff had a verdict for twenty-five dollars. The judgment upon the verdict has been affirmed, both at the general term of the supreme court and the court of appeals ; and, after such affirmance, a motion is made for a new trial at the special term upon two grounds, to wit: First. That the wife of Solomon Sahler, a juror, is the third…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. StilwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fiske v. PaineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1894
  2. Stone v. O'NeilNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Bolt v. Hauser, New York County Courts1890
  4. Stedman v. BatchelorNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Ballard v. TuylAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API