Fiske v. Paine
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Appellants’ petition for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStiness, J.
At the September Term, 1892, of this court,' in the county of Kent, the appellants contested the validity of the will of the late Horatio N. Waterman of Coventry. A verdict was rendered sustaining the will, which gave the residuum of the estate to the Town Council of Coventry, in trust for the support of the poor of said town. The appellants how petition for a new trial upon the ground that the foreman of the jury was the son of a taxpayer in said town, and so disqualified, by relationship, from serving as a juror ; which disqualification entitles them to have the verdict set aside as for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wassum v. FeeneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Simmons & Winch v. McConnellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
- Woodward v. DeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Spicer v. . FulghumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- McDonald v. BeallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BerberianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Destitute of Bennington County v. HENRY W. PUTNAM MHSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- State v. KieonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1959