Legal Opinion

Heitz v. Champagne

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1992No. 17951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

John Heitz, a real estate broker, appeals from a summary judgment denying his claims for damages in the aftermath of the purchase of real estate by the defendants, Reid and Denise Champagne. Heitz was the listing broker for the real estate purchased by the Champagnes.

*701Heitz based Count I of his petition on allegations of malicious prosecution by the Champagnes of a lawsuit they previously had brought against him and other defendants. That prior lawsuit (Case No. 1), which arose out of the real estate transaction, was settled. Heitz based Count II of his petition on allegations of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Zueck v. Oppenheimer Gateway Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Peerless Supply Co. v. Industrial Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. Gast v. EbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  4. Max v. SpaethSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Schwartz v. LawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Collins v. Missouri Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Vidacak v. Oklahoma Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Bailey v. City of GoodmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Steve Spicer Motors, Inc. v. GilliamMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. American National Insurance Co. v. Noble Communications Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API