Legal Opinion · Concurrence

American National Insurance Co. v. Noble Communications Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1996No. 20555Published

1ConcurrenceShrum, Judge

I concur in J. Parrish’s opinion. However, as to Lessee’s first point, I would emphasize that Lessee did waive this issue at oral argument lest we leave the impression that merely addressing affirmative defenses in a memorandum in support of or in opposition to a motion for summary judgment is sufficient to dispel them. This is especially true for the defense of equitable estoppel as it is largely factually based. As this court has observed:

“ ‘No definition of estoppel, however, can be completely satisfactory. An equitable estoppel rests largely on the facts and circumstances of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miskimen v. Kansas City Star Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. LacyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Heitz v. ChampagneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API