In re Unopened Portion of Lancaster Avenue

MacNeille, J.,

We are considering petitioner’s rule on the viewers to show cause why they shall not proceed with hearings.

On April 7,1936, the petitioner asked the appointment of a board of view, and such board was designated by the court and proceeded with hearings. The board, however, discontinued its hearings, apparently because it believes that its right to do so was affected by an Act of Assembly *40passed on April 28,1937, P. L. 473, which provided, inter alia, that' in counties of the first class a board of view shall be appointed from among the members of the Board of Revision of Taxes…