Legal Opinion

Lackawanna Mills v. Scranton Gas & Water Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1923No. Appeal, No. 275PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The Lackawanna Mills and the Scranton Button Company are owners of parts of a tract of land in the City of Scranton, known as Block 4. For many years the factories, located upon the property, had secured their water supply by pumping from Stafford Meadow Brook. The Scranton Gas & Water Company desired to make use of the stream and, on April 17, 1888, entered into an agreement with the then owner, Connell & Company, by which the privilege of constructing a dam was granted, with the right to use the surplus flow. In consideration, it was agreed a pipe should be laid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hannum v. Borough of West ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  2. Bethlehem South Gas & Water Co. v. YoderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Bowers v. Citizens' Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Condemnation of 2719, 2721 and 2711Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Lackawanna Mills v. Scranton Gas & Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. In re Unopened Portion of Lancaster AvenuePhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1937
  4. Mercy Hospital v. City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API