Legal Opinion

Jackman v. Estate of Pitterson

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided August 6, 2008No. D.C. Civil App. No. 2004/147PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(August 6, 2008)

I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL HISTORY

James Jackman (“Jackman” or “Appellant”) was an employee of the decedent, Felix Pitterson (“Pitterson” or “decedent”). As part of that employment, Jackman maintained real property owned by the decedent and also resided on such property at No. 2 Beck’s Grove in Frederiksted. Jackman contends that Pitterson, prior to his death in 1991, orally promised him ownership of land at Becks Grove, in consideration for his services in maintaining that property.1 However, Pitterson’s promise to Jackman was not reduced to writing.

Following…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Warner-Lambert Company v. Breathasure, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Federal Security Administrator v. Quaker Oats Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Browne v. GoreSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
  2. Barnes v. WeberSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API