Legal Opinion
Lohrenzen v. Brown
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 14, 1998No. 73945PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellant Gustav Lohrenzen appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing appellant’s complaint. Appellant assigns the following errors for our review:
“I. The court erred in dismissing counts one (fraud) and two (breach of contract) pursuant to R.C. 2305.19 because both claims were filed within their respective statutes of limitations, and R.C. 2305.19 does not apply where a claim is dismissed and refiled before the statute of limitations has run.
“II. The court erred in dismissing count three (Ohio Consumer Sales Practice Act) because the claim was filed within the two year statute…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thomas v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- McCann v. City of LakewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Branscom v. BirtcherOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of Wagner v. HeavlinOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Mihalcin v. Hocking College, Unpublished Decision (3-20-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Osborn v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Warren v. Mortgage Vision, Inc., Unpublished Decision (2-20-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003