State Ex Rel. Peter v. Listman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.
This action in mandamus was brought by Allen E. Peter in the superior court to compel the city of Seattle, through its proper officers, to appoint him as patrolman on the police force, and to recover back salary. Upon filing the complaint, a show cause order or alternative writ was issued and served. The defendants, upon appearing in the cause, filed a general demurrer to the complaint. After-wards an answer was filed, which the relator moved to strike, claiming it was not in time, that it should have been filed with the demurrer.
The denial of the motion to strike is assigned as error.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Hart v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Bloomer v. Todd, Washington Territory1888
- Commercial Cable Co. v. SameDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1919
- Sichofsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- Winkenwerder v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Burger v. Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Diamond International Corp. v. BoasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Hoover v. SandifurWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Diamond International Corp. v. BoasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.