Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Henderson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1894No. 1,072PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Johnson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

The overruling of the appellant’s demurrer to the first paragraph of the reply is the only error relied upon for a reversal of the judgment.

The case stands upon the third paragraph of the complaint, the third paragraph of the answer, and the first paragraph of the reply. The court having overruled the demurrer to the first paragraph of the reply, and “the appellant biding the demurrer, the case was submitted to the court for the assessment of damages,” and there was judgment for the appellee for $100.

The substance of the averments of the third paragraph of the complaint is that the appellant,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cupp v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Scott v. StetlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Kernodle v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Chicago Railroad v. ClarksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  5. State ex rel. Dunham v. RocheIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beckett v. LittleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API