State ex rel. Dunham v. Roche
Indiana Supreme Court
•From the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Colerick, C.
This was an action brought by the appellant against the appellees upon a bond executed by Mahon as guardian of the rclatrix, and by DeLong as surety. The complaint, in substance, averred that Mahon was, on the 10th day of October, 1871, duly appointed by the clerk of the •court of common pleas of Huntington county, Indiana, guardian of the person and property of the relatrix, and filed his *373bond as such guardian, conditioned for the faithful performance of his duties, with DeLong as surety thereon, a copy of which bond is filed with and made a part of the complaint, by which it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Colburn v. State ex rel. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Mustard v. HoppessIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Boden v. DillIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Frazee v. FrazeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Kernodle v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nowlin v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
- Simons v. BeaverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HendersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894