Legal Opinion

C. A. Babcock Co. v. Katz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

The first witness for the plaintiff, O. A. Babcock, president and manager of the plaintiff corporation, testified as follows:

“Q. Just tell the jury how this account happened to be opened, this account in question, the Waucomah Farm, with J. A. Lipp & Company. A. Why, he came there first, they were buying through another house and we were filling the order for this house and he came in one day and wanted to know why he could not buy direct. He said he and Mr. Katz were partners in the Waucomah Farm and he would like to buy from us as it was a lot more convenient; he didn’t like to go to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Winship v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Thompson v. First Nat. Bank of ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Mayes v. StephensOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Call v. LinnOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Carlon v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Buscaglia v. Tribunal de ContribucionesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
  2. First National Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Kilgore Seed Co. v. LewinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. Dority v. DrieselCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Bryant v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API