Continental Casualty Co. v. Clark
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Seminole County: Tom D. McKeown. Judge. Suit by Mabel A. Clark against the Continental Casualty Company Defendant’s demurrer to the evidence overruled, and verdict directed for plaintiff, motion for a new trial denied, and on plaintiff’s motion for a new trial judgment increased, and defendant brings error, and plaintiff brings cross-error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
WEST. C.
This was a suit instituted in the district court of Seminole county on July 14, 1914, by defendant in error, plaintiff below, against plaintiff in error, defendant below, to recover on an accident insurance contract issued by plaintiff in error to Hartley M. Clark, in his lifetime, naming the defendant in error as beneficiary. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as they appeared in the court below.
On the 16th day of February, 1916, cause was tried to a jury, after the evidence of plaintiff had been introduced, defendant demurred to the evidence, the same was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Continental Casualty Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
3Cited by21 opinions
- Richards v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
- Goethe v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Lower v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Suggs v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Mitchell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.