Continental Casualty Co. v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Harvey district court; Peter J. Galle, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
MASON, J.:
Grant G. Johnson held a policy of insurance issued by the Continental Casualty Company, the principal purpose of which was to provide indemnity to the amount of ten dollars a week- against loss occasioned by accidental injury, its phraseology being that usually employed in contracts of that character. It also contained a provision as follows;
“The loss of . . . time, as above provided, due solely to . . . sunstroke or freezing due solely to *130necessary exposure while engaged in his occupation, shall be deemed to be due to external, violent and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dozier v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1891
- Insurance Co. v. TrefzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Goethe v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Elsey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Continental Casualty Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Farmer v. Railway Mail Assn.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.