Legal Opinion

Turrisi v. Sanzaro

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 4, 1987No. 60, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

The questions presented in this case are

1. Whether appellee, Katherine M. Sanzaro, at a hearing in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, waived any claim to immediate alimony? and

2. Do the provisions of Title 11, subtitle 1, of the Family Law Article empower a circuit court to reserve its jurisdiction over alimony?

We answer both questions in the affirmative.

Although the parties are not in total agreement as to the facts, there is little dispute about those bearing on the issues before us. Katherine Sanzaro and appellant, Brian C. Turrisi, are both medical doctors. They…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Sharrow v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Prate v. FreedmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Brodak v. BrodakCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. McSherry v. McSherryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  5. Dackman v. DackmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tracey v. TraceyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Chernick v. ChernickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Collins v. Hesson (In Re Hesson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  4. Donahue v. DonahueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Solomon v. SolomonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API