Legal Opinion

People v. Galligan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), dated February 23, 2005, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not incorrectly calculate the total points assessed on his risk assessment instrument (hereinafter RAI). Further,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. People v. MastersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. PerserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BanksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People v. GochnourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API