People v. Galligan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), dated February 23, 2005, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not incorrectly calculate the total points assessed on his risk assessment instrument (hereinafter RAI). Further,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. MastersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. PerserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BanksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. GochnourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008