Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Allen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2017No. 20170061PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶1] Attorney Gene Allen objects to a report of a hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board finding that he violated several rules of professional conduct while serving as his mother’s attorney-in-fact and as the personal representative of her estate, and recommending that he be suspended from the practice of law and pay the costs and expenses of the disciplinary proceedings. *242We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence that Allen violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.7, 1.9, and 8,4, We order that Allen be suspended from the, practice of law for six months and order that he pay $15,360.77 for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estates of Vizenor and Vizenor v. MeslingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. BullisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Vendsel v. VendselNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. McDonaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Bd. of the Supreme Court v. Varriano (In re Varriano )North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Higgenbottom v. MeisnerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
  3. Stuber v. EngelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API