Legal Opinion
Kim v. Town of Orangetown
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 1971PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeonard Rubeneield, J.
In this action for a declaratory judgment, plaintiff moves for a preliminary injunction restraining the defendant Town of Orangetown, and its officers, agents and *365employees, from enforcing Town of Orangetown Local Law No. 1 of 1971, entitled ££ Regulation of Pregnancy Termination Facilities
Plaintiff is a licensed physician engaged in the private practice of medicine and specializing in obstetrics and gynecology. He maintains one office in New York City and another at his home located in the hamlet of Tappan, Town of Orangetown. The latter facility is operated under a certificate of occupancy…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Defiance Milk Products Co. v. Du MondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Wholesale Laundry Board of Trade, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- S. H. Kress & Co. v. Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Jewish Consumptives' Relief Society v. Town of WoodburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Robin v. Incorporated Village of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Sherman v. FrazierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Atkins v. City of Tarrant CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- DISPOS. SOLUTIONS-LANDFILL v. Town of LowndesboroCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.