United States v. Wilson
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, District Judge.
This case involves a record similar to that in United States v. John Foote, 42 F.Supp. 717, wherein I have this day filed an opinion, except that here the Defendant further contends that his constitutional right against self incrimination has been violated.
The record shows that in response to a subpoena, the Defendant appeared and testified before a grand jury and that the indictment returned in this case was based in part on this testimony. The Defendant did not claim his constitutional privilege *722to refrain from giving testimony against himself nor was he advised of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mulloney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- O'CONNELL v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- United States v. KimballU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
- Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
- United States v. WetmoreDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Patrick J. ScullyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- United States v. KleinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- United States v. WortmanDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1960
- United States v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- United States v. ScullyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.