Legal Opinion
People v. Barton
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1963No. Crim. 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.
Defendant-respondent was charged in the Municipal Court of Oceanside Judicial District with the crime of violating section 2191 of the Oceanside Ordinance Code, in that on January 9, 1962, defendant was then and there a person who did willfully and unlawfully solicit, and peddle on private property, to wit: 428D Garfield Street in the City of Oceanside, not having been requested to do so by the owner or occupant of said private residence, all of which is in violation of Oceanside Ordinance Code, section 2191.
Previously, the city council enacted section 2191, supra. It provides as follows:
“Home…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Merced County v. Helm & NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Town of Green River v. Fuller Brush Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- MacLeod v. City of Los AltosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Phillips v. City of BendOregon Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cook v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Kirkpatrick v. Henry G.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Cabrillo Community College District v. California Junior College Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Adamson Companies v. ZippAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1984
- Adamson Companies v. ZippCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.