Legal Opinion
Adamson Companies v. Zipp
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided November 15, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 15963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*Supp. 5Opinion
SHABO, J.
On this appeal by defendants in an unlawful detainer action from a judgment, rendered after a trial to the court, we are asked to address issues of first impression arising out of the Mobilehome Residency Law (Civ. Code, § 798 et seq.), and the Mobilehome Parks Act (Health & Saf. Code, § 18200 et seq.). In particular, we are called upon to decide whether omission strictly to comply with the notice to “legal” and “registered” owner procedure established by section 798.55, subdivision (b) of the Civil Code defeats the landlord’s right to maintain an unlawful detainer…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kern v. County of ImperialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Raiton v. G & R Properties (In Re Raiton)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Adamson Companies v. ZippCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Canyon View Ltd. v. Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019