Phillip Maurice Hicks v. Berkeley County, et al.
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Phillip Maurice Hicks, Case No. 8:25-cv-13989-RMG Plaintiff, v. ORDER Berkeley County, et al. Defendants. This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that this action be summarily dismissed without issuance and service of process and without leave to amend. (Dkt. No. 16). Plaintiff filed objections to the R&R. (Dkt. No. 18). The matter has been fully briefed and is ripe for disposition. I. Background Plaintiff, acting pro se, sued a wide range…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.