Legal Opinion

Phillip Maurice Hicks v. Berkeley County, et al.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided February 13, 2026No. 8:25-cv-13989Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Phillip Maurice Hicks, Case No. 8:25-cv-13989-RMG Plaintiff, v. ORDER Berkeley County, et al. Defendants. This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that this action be summarily dismissed without issuance and service of process and without leave to amend. (Dkt. No. 16). Plaintiff filed objections to the R&R. (Dkt. No. 18). The matter has been fully briefed and is ripe for disposition. I. Background Plaintiff, acting pro se, sued a wide range…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  3. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API