Legal Opinion

Burnett v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2004No. 02A04-0404-CR-221PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Daryl Burnett, Jr., appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for Kidnapping, a Class A felony, and Robbery, as a Class B felony. Burnett presents two issues for review:

1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion under Indiana Evidence Rule 702 when it allowed the State's fingerprint expert to testify as an expert at trial.

2. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to sustain Burnett's convictions.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On May 6, 2003, an African American male approached Vicki Quilhot as she was getting out of her…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Love v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Steward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hape v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Devall DavidsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Bond v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Mogg v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Estate of Dyer v. DoyleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API