ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. Heath
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
1. “The amendment to the Code, § 6-806, by the Act of 1946 (Ga. L. 1946, p. 726), making certain changes in our law of appellate procedure, is construed to mean that, where the trial judge’s certificate to a bill of exceptions varies from the form as contained in § 6-806, the language of his certificate cannot, merely by implication, be construed as being a denial of the truth of any part of the bill; but the language of the certificate shall be construed as a verification of the contents of the bill unless it affirmatively appears to be a denial of the truth of some part…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Franklin v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Mimbs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Crumley v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Harris v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. MitchamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Crockett v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
- Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974